In-breadth interview (IDI)

Twenty villages where SS was presented have been chose at random out of a whole range of 2 hundred towns where knowledge got taken place ranging from , we.elizabeth. 1-3 years before the questionnaire. Away from every one of these 20 SS towns, i picked that prior trainee to own a partial-planned, in-breadth interviews. 1 / 2 of was in fact picked at random of an inventory made by KHPT professionals of individuals which they employees envision had benefited off degree: the other 1 / 2 of had been picked randomly on the large list away from students. Each one of the chose SS trainees was also asked to recognize a friend or relative to own interview, individuals with who it shared a virtually dating. They certainly were maybe not advised of one’s factor in new interview. New interviews was indeed held about regional vernacular of the interviewers coached in the semi-prepared interviewing. Questions included their point of views towards SS knowledge, secret training achieved and you can mutual, point of views into the individual attitudinal and you may behavioral alter, and you will opinions on transform attributable to SS, amongst their household members and in the city. The IDI transcripts have been analyzed yourself to own repeated themes and you will records.

Polling Booth Surveys (PBS)

Polling Booth Surveys (PBS) have been used by KHPT and others to obtain information on delicate subjects such as sexual practices; the methodology has been reported elsewhere . In summary, participants are interviewed in a group, though each person is behind a polling booth-type screen. The PBS sessions were conducted by trained PBS facilitators in the local vernacular in 40 villages: 20 where SS had been conducted in 2005, and 20 where no such training had been done. First we divided each village into 6 segments and randomly assigned each segment to chatki ne iÅŸe yarar one of the following 6 groups (unmarried women and unmarried men, younger married women and men, older married women and men). In each segment, one house was selected at random as a “starter” house. In this home, we listed all members of the household. If any person satisfied the criteria for inclusion, we requested their participation (if there was more than one such person in the house, we selected one at random). Then working to the left, we followed the same procedure in each house until we had invited 12 people in the appropriate group, giving an approximate total invited sample of 1440 respondents in the 20 SS villages and 1440 in the 20 non-SS villages. We were able to poll 1196 respondents in SS villages (83% response) and 1297 (90% response) in other villages, with a combined sample of 2493 (87% response). In addition, as many SS trainees as possible from the 20 Stepping Stones villages, were convenience-sampled to participate in a separate PBS session. In all 414 former trainees were sampled. Questions were a mixture of ones used in previous KHPT PBS and some were taken from the GEM Scale . The questions focused on knowledge, attitude and behaviour and involved yes/no or don’t know/not applicable responses. The knowledge and attitude questions were the same for all groups, but the behaviour questions differed according to what was appropriate for the specific group. All PBS data were entered into Excel spreadsheets and differences between groups were calculated using a chi-squared test. Preliminary analysis found that the general population samples were very similar; however the SS group profile was different to that of the general population samples (p < 0.01, Table 1), so the data from the SS trainee group were adjusted directly, using the stratum-specific denominator of the SS general population group as the standard population. Differences between groups were then calculated in STATA version 10 (STATA Corporation, USA) and p values calculated using a z-test (test of equality between proportions).